Socialist Action

 

SOCIALIST

ACTION

 

 - home page

 - newspaper
 - subscribe
 - distribute

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kinder, Gentler Capitalism?

by Joe Auciello  / November 2009

 

“Capitalism: A Love Story” is Michael Moore’s most ambitious but not most successful film. He wants to show how capitalism in America today does not work as well as it did in the past due to mismanagement, corporate greed, and the failure of government oversight. He hopes for “a kinder, gentler” capitalism. Unfortunately, Moore is not radical enough; he does not grasp the root cause of economic oppression.

 

Still, there is much to applaud here. In this film Moore puts a human face on the victims of the system. He shows people losing their homes, fired from their jobs, jailed without cause, and swindled by the despicable schemes of employers and insurance companies. He shows the devastation left behind on cities and towns when companies collapse or move away in search of higher profit.

 

Perhaps even more important, Moore shows people banding together and fighting back, preventing housing foreclosures and, in the case of Republic Windows and Doors, preventing companies from throwing workers out like trash. The old slogan, “An injury to one is an injury to all,” comes to life in this film.

 

Moore continues his unique style of confrontational comedy, where simple common sense runs afoul of corporate greed. His effort to retrieve misused bailout money and return it to the federal treasury, for instance, is flat-out hilarious. So too with his failed attempts to seek interviews with people in power so that he may speak truth to them. Their arrogant silence conveys an essential lesson: power means never having to say anything to anybody. From these humorous situations Moore draws out his essential theme, that America needs more democracy.

 

Though Moore excels in portraying the symptoms of oppression—no small achievement—he does not grasp the nature of exploitation within capitalism. It’s as if everything went wrong with federal deregulation and the election of Ronald Reagan, while capitalist oppression will end if Obama adopts the crusading spirit of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and implements a steeply progressive tax code. Moore fails to distinguish between bad policies and a bad system. He does not recognize the fundamental and irresolvable social antagonism between capital and wage labor.

 

Workers must produce more value than they earn. The extra value which they produce goes into the hands of capitalists. Without profit founded on inequality, a form of theft perpetrated every day on millions of people, capitalism could not exist.

 

Since exploitation is built into capitalism, the system cannot be altered fundamentally by reforms, no matter how thoroughgoing, no matter how necessary and just. To survive, capitalism must expropriate profit from workers. Real democracy means that “the expropriators must still be expropriated.”

 

Few other films put social oppression on the screen and ask whether the economic system that creates and thrives on human alienation and suffering should continue to exist. Credit Moore for raising the essential questions, ones that will linger in a viewer’s mind long after the closing credits.

 

 

Human Needs, Not Profits!