Socialist Action

 

SOCIALIST

ACTION

 

 - home page

 - newspaper
 - subscribe
 - distribute

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Bankruptcy of Capitalist Solutions to the Climate Crisis

by Christine Frank  / March 2009

 

We live on a planet in peril, one that is in jeopardy because of capitalist greed. The combustion of fossils fuels to power commodity production is causing Earth to melt down. Yet, no measurable progress is being made to cope with the situation since greenhouse gas emissions continue to spew forth with no end in sight, CO2 concentrations have spiked every year this century and temperatures are still rising.

 

We are on the verge of complete climate chaos as a cascade of positive feedbacks pushes us ever closer to dangerous tipping points while putting all of Nature horribly out of balance. Still, the capitalist class continues to resist with all its might the implementation of viable solutions that will allow us to adapt to the dramatic changes that are occurring.

 

The reason for this is the almighty profit motive, which drives them to extract ever more raw materials to produce ever more goods, many of which have little to do with the satisfaction of genuine human needs. This frantic production of things they’ve convinced us we all desperately need is for what has now become a seriously oversaturated and failing market.

Let’s face it, capitalism has had 250 years to prove that it can produce the necessities of life without harming the natural world and humanity, and it has failed the test miserably.

 

In regard to the climate crisis, the primary strategy of the capitalist ruling class is to basically ignore it and to engage in desperate attempts to wrest the remaining hydrocarbons from the bowels of Earth. They relentlessly chase the last barrel of oil by waging bloody resource wars under the pretext of fighting terrorism, lifting the moratorium on offshore drilling, auctioning oil and gas leases, continually threatening to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to exploitation, engaging in destructive tar-sands and oil-shale extraction—and using carbon dioxide, ironically, to coax recovery from depleted oil reservoirs and coalbed methane fields.

 

To get at what is left of our coal reserves, they must go deeper and deeper with deadly retreat mining, blast the tops clean off of mountains, or strip away the land, leaving devastated ecosystems and human lives.

 

To offer the illusion that they are actually doing something to mitigate climate change, they offer an array of non-solutions that only do further harm either directly or indirectly because they serve as stalling tactics that suck us deeper into the mire of environmental devastation and climate catastrophe.

 

As a class, the capitalists’ sense of self-preservation is as strong as ever. As individual human beings living on a planet in peril, they seem to have no basic survival instincts whatsoever as they continue to pursue policies that are racing us, themselves included, toward certain annihilation.

 

Carbon-trading schemes

 

Those responsible for the climate crisis—the Carbon Barons and others of their ilk—refuse to deal with it in any substantive way. At first, their strategy was to deny global warming is occurring, then to say it is not caused by human activity and to employ a host of skeptics whose job it was to cast doubt on the evidence. Now that the science is unassailable and the debate is over, they endlessly stall and do essentially nothing as time runs out.

 

So that business can proceed as usual, the best the captains of industry and their subservient politicians can come up with is a plethora of tactics that will avoid meaningful change and allow them to fuel the economy in the manner to which it has been accustomed. They have proposed carbon-trading and auction schemes that are nothing but licenses to pollute, to be bought and sold on an exchange, with brokers receiving a tidy commission in the bargain.

 

Incredible as it may seem, European governments have so massively over-allocated CO2 permits as to cause the carbon market to crash because of falling prices. It is just another means to create more fictitious capital in a futile attempt to solve their liquidity crisis.

 

To the extent that carbon trading accomplishes anything, it results in the commodification of Earth’s carbon-cycling system and is just one more attempt to privatize Nature. Furthermore, it is nothing but a phony accounting scheme that will only give a free hand to the big corporate polluters to get away with murder. Cooking the books will only cook the planet!

 

Carbon trading has been the primary strategy of the European Union. As a consequence, every EU nation has been forced to admit in utter disgrace that they will not make their emission-reductions goals for the first round of the Kyoto Protocol. With the worldwide financial crisis as an excuse, heads of government and environment ministers are all crying poverty and demanding that the targets be lowered so they can continue to backslide on goals they were not even close to meeting in the first place.

 

This was the main thrust of the UN climate-change conference held in Poznan, Poland, in December 2008.  They cannot be allowed to use the financial crisis as a justification for their inaction. We must say, "Save the Climate, not Wall Street!"

 

To the extent that big-polluting Europe has reduced its greenhouse gas emissions at all, it has done so by shipping its manufacturing to the Southern Hemisphere, where its multi-nationals are super-exploiting the labor and befouling the environment of poor countries while robbing European workers of decent-paying union jobs—just as they do here. Given all that and the gross, raging maldevelopment of India and China, the Kyoto Protocol has been rendered a cruel joke.

 

We must denounce "the win-win scenarios" of the Carbon Barons and the rest of the capitalist class. We cannot allow the bosses, who have gotten rich off of our backs, to buy their way out of purgatory—a purgatory in which we now all languish and where many are dying by the millions amidst unspeakable suffering.

 

Carbon offsets

 

Another of their brilliant ideas is the sale of carbon offsets designed to ease the consciences of frequent flyers and overconsuming Hollywood celebrities. This pay-now, sin-later plan is reminiscent of the sale of indulgences by the medieval church. After greasing the palms of the corrupt hierarchy, sinners were allowed to go on transgressing while ensuring a reprieve in the Hereafter.

 

These contrivances also go under the ludicrous name of carbon-credit logging based on the notion that old-growth forests eventually max out on the amount of carbon they can store in their lifetimes. Studies have shown that this is not true, and ancient forests need to be protected.

 

The purchase of carbon offsets by planting trees—often genetically modified varieties—in sterile monocultural plantations devoid of understory is only making the problem worse by creating what the local people in the Southern Hemisphere call "green deserts." Natural forests, bogs, wetlands, and grasslands—on which indigenous people must subsist—are foolishly being destroyed for this purpose after they have conveniently been declared degraded land. The carbon traders have been cheating on calculations for the offsets, grossly overestimating the ability of the trees to absorb more carbon.

 

Any botanist will tell you that carbon fixation rates vary greatly within even the same species of plant, depending upon the local microclimate, soils, hydrology, and other factors under which it is growing. Needless to say, a plantation in which trees are arranged uniformly in neat, straight rows and cleared of all other competing vegetation with the use of herbicides is not as richly biodiverse as a real forest and can never store as much carbon as the original ecosystem it replaced.

 

There is a tremendous difference between monocrops and a tropical rainforest with its canopy, multiple layers of understory and complex interactions among species all the way down to the microbial level. Monocultural tree plantations are ecologically unstable, being more vulnerable to disease and wildfire, which can release carbon instantly back into the atmosphere. Likewise, there is a huge difference between the impacts of carbon from fossil fuel combustion and biological carbon in trees as it is cycled from forest to ocean to atmosphere.

 

Once credit for the offsets has been sufficiently laundered through the system, the cheap, fast-growing eucalyptus and pine trees will be harvested, releasing their carbon and becoming net emitters. The whole process of land clearing releases stored carbon from the soil as well.

 

The result of offsets of this sort is to transform the developing world into a cheap carbon dump while the crisis worsens daily. They destroy the ability of local people to live, placing the burden for the richest nations’ contribution to global warming onto the backs of the poorest with what is not only a biological monoculture but a social one as well.

 

The destruction of the commons further marginalizes already marginalized peoples and robs them of their natural entitlements. It is completely at odds with the concept of climate justice and equity.

 

We must oppose these non-solutions, which advance globalization and neoliberal policies to benefit the transnationals and further their efforts to swallow up the resources of the planet. The foundation of carbon trading and offsets is dead wrong and a big lie. We must also stand against the World Bank, IMF, and G8 nations that promote these wretched schemes and stand in solidarity instead, with those who are the victims of them.

 

Carbon tax

 

Seeing the uselessness of carbon trading and offsets, some, including NASA’s chief climatologist James Hansen, are proposing a carbon tax to be implemented at the wellhead, mine gate, or port of entry. This would be the point at which the least amount of value has been added to the oil, gas, or coal. Somewhere along the line, it would supposedly enable the reduction of payroll taxes, and everyone would receive a dividend, the size of which would depend upon their fossil-fuel usage.

 

The rationale is that working people, the poor, disadvantaged, and environmentally conscious would be rewarded for their frugality and wisdom by receiving a larger dividend. Whereas, the privileged and foolhardy would be punished for their prodigality by receiving virtually nothing—so justice would prevail.

 

Unfortunately, knowing how the wealthy cheat on their taxes by wriggling through loopholes, once again it would be working people who pay the most. If the rich did bite the bullet and paid the tax, workers would suffer even further when the tax jacked up energy prices and subsequently the cost of everything else.

 

Although we must all tread more gently on the planet and reduce our ecological footprint, working men and women should not be made to sacrifice and pay for our employers’ crimes against Nature. By robbing us of our health, a clean environment, and our ability to support ourselves and our families, those crimes have been committed against us too as well as future generations.

 

We’ve been paying long enough. "Tax Corporate Polluters, Not Consumers!" Haul the violators to prison and throw away the key!

 

"Clean coal" and other myths

 

The myth of clean coal has been perpetuated by the coal industry and candidates for office by promoting carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) techniques. Carbon capture of CO2 from coal-fired power plants will have an enormous energy penalty, requiring even more coal to be mined, transported, pulverized, and burned. Sequestration will require a vast network of pipelines and pumping stations to store liquefied, supercritical, dense-phase carbon dioxide.

 

There is no guarantee that the CO2 will remain buried in the depleted oil and gas reservoirs or geological formations they propose using since there are numerous migration pathways for slow leakage to occur that can contaminate ground and surface water. There is also the risk of catastrophic escapes of CO2 that can asphyxiate vegetation at the roots, which require oxygen, and smother all life in the immediate vicinity at the surface.

 

Storing our greenhouse gas pollution in the ocean will have severe ecological consequences for marine life in terms of seawater acidification and hypoxia that will ultimately lead to death for any organism that cannot escape. Nor can we afford to further lower the pH of the seas. Ocean sequestration is only temporary since the CO2 will eventually outgas into the atmosphere, especially as sea-water warms.

 

In reality, out of the approximately 600 coal-fired power plants in the United States, there is not a single one that has CCS in operation. It is nothing but hype by the coal industry, which has spent millions on ad campaigns talking up the oxymoronic concept of "clean coal." Coal is about as clean as a cigarette is healthy, and it should be left in the ground where Mother Nature put it along with all the rest of the filthy fossil fuels.

 

They also expect us to swallow the buckets of greenwash coming from the nuclear power industry, designed to finagle billions in loan guarantees from Congress and turn public opinion in favor of more reactors. There is nothing green about nukes, nor are they by any means carbon-neutral since greenhouse gases are generated in every stage of the nuclear cycle.

 

Nonetheless, they propose building a second generation of nuclear reactors, threatening us with even more routine radioactive emissions, more stockpiles of deadly wastes, and more murderous Chernobyls—which will further irradiate all life on the planet. We must say loudly and clearly, "Don’t nuke the climate!"

 

In order to maintain the wasteful, ruinous car/truck culture, they encourage the production of ethanol from corn and cane sugar and biodiesel from soy, rape seed, and palm oil. Corn ethanol uses vast amounts of inputs—diesel fuel for farm machinery, chemical fertilizers and pesticides, and large amounts of irrigation water—pumping the Ogallala Aquifer dry.

 

Ethanol plants pollute the air, soil, and water. In addition, there is just something wrong with using a fermentation process that generates carbon dioxide. Putting food in gas tanks is driving up food prices and threatening the hungry with famine. The protests in Mexico over the price of maize are an example of where things are headed.

 

Corn ethanol is nothing but a massive subsidy to U.S. agribusiness, benefiting mostly the big producers like ADM, not the small ones. Nonetheless, there is a frantic scramble by farmers to put more acreage into corn, planting it fence to fence, causing more soil erosion, taking land out of conservation programs and adding to the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico.

 

The cultivation of switchgrass on marginal lands for cellulosic ethanol is just as foolish. A monoculture does not an ecosystem make, even though university types like to argue, "Oh, but it will provide habitat for wildlife before it’s mowed."

 

In Brazil, cane-sugar producers are expanding onto grazing lands, which forces ranchers to encroach on the Amazon rainforest. Cane workers are superexploited, toiling under miserable conditions, and there is a movement against building anymore ethanol plants in the country. Soy production, heavily promoted by Cargill, is also destroying huge areas of the rainforest.

 

In Southeast Asia, the tropical rainforests are being burned and replaced with palm-oil plantations for the refinement of biodiesel, at the expense of ecosystems and the subsistence of indigenous people. Europe uses rape seed or canola oil with absolutely no net gain in the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions—the lesson being that burning carbohydrates instead of hydrocarbons is not a solution to the climate crisis.

 

Techno-fixes and individual solutions

 

Encouraging the purchase of expensive hybrid motor vehicles that most cannot afford does not significantly help the situation either. The planet can no longer spare the enormous amount of resources that go into the production of private automobiles so each of us can toot around in our own personal little bubble. As Richard Heinberg says, "We don’t need alternative cars. We need alternatives to cars!"  The answer is clean mass transit run on wind and solar power.

 

A revitalized rail system would include both light urban rail and cross-country passenger and freight service. The production of electric locomotives and train carriages is a way to create jobs. We must say, "Fund Clean Mass Transit, Not Big Dirty Auto!

 

Advocating investment in a hybrid or changing to compact fluorescent bulbs tends to place the blame on us rather than where it really lies—with the corporate polluters—thereby taking them conveniently off the hook. Most so-called energy alternatives being touted are intended to reduce the U.S. dependence upon foreign oil and enable us to keep living it up like there’s no tomorrow, rather than cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

 

The incineration of biomass for power and heating is another thing capitalist entrepreneurs like to paint green. Wood chips and other vegetable matter should be mulched or composted so the nutrients can be returned to the soil.

 

A wood burner was just defeated in a Minneapolis Native American and Latino neighborhood that had already been afflicted with widespread arsenic contamination from an old pesticide plant. They said, "No! We’ve had enough! Get out of here!" forcing the developers to run with their tail between their legs to another neighborhood—where they will have to be fought.

 

The emissions from refuse-derived fuel, i.e., garbage, is full of dioxins and other toxic contaminants that erode human health. Burning rubbish is nothing but a license to commit unbridled waste. We should adopt a policy of zero waste by reducing, restoring, reusing, and recycling at the point of production.

 

Breaking down kitchen scraps or manure from factory farms with anaerobic digesters to produce methane is another harebrained idea. Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas, exceeding CO2 by 23 times. Kitchen wastes and manure—preferably from free-range, organic livestock production conducted on a modest scale—should be composted into humus and then placed on the soil to re-enrich it.

 

Still another indication of the bankruptcy of capitalist solutions to the climate crisis, not to mention bourgeois science, is the proliferation of technological fixes. Getting attention are such absurd ideas as the launching of mirrors into space to reflect solar radiation away from the planet. This technocratic idiocy is about as practical as colonizing the moon or terraforming Mars to create a neo-Earth. 

 

Another, on which they have actually conducted experiments, is the geo-engineering plan to fertilize the oceans with iron to stimulate photosynthesis in the surface waters in order to increase carbon absorption. The result will be to alter seawater chemistry and upset the nutrient cycle.

 

The truth is that there are no magic solutions to neutralizing fossil fuel emissions or making them just go away. We must stop burning all hydrocarbons immediately and adopt clean renewables.

 

We need to build a powerful and uncompromising environmental movement led by working people in alliance with other oppressed groups in society. In addition, we must infuse this new movement with eco-socialist principles that go beyond the maintenance of capitalism and its suicidal and genocidal policies and advance toward a zero-waste, democratically planned socialist economy that is green and sustainable and puts planetary and human needs before profits.

 

This will enable us finally to make peace and end the war on Nature. The only hope for future generations lies in creating a rational, humane, ecological culture and society in which we may finally exist in harmony along side the other life forms with whom we humbly share this world, and live according to Nature’s laws—not those of capital.

 

 

Human Needs, Not Profits!