Socialist Action

 

SOCIALIST

ACTION

 

 - home page

 - newspaper
 - subscribe
 - distribute

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxi Strikes Hit NYC & Philadelphia 

by Marty Goodman / October 2007 issue of Socialist Action newspaper

 

 

NEW YORK—Members of the overwhelmingly immigrant Taxi Workers Alliance (TWA) here and in Philadelphia struck in early September to stop a big-brother scheme of taxi bosses to track taxi workers’ every move with a Global Positioning System (GPS) in each cab.

 

“Drivers have stood up in unity, have stood up for themselves, have demanded dignity on the job and have said, ‘We will fight back!’” said Bhairavi Desai, a co-founder and executive director of New York’s TWA.  But despite the heavy participation of TWA members in both cities, it has thus far been unable to stop the GPS plans—or to get New York City to back down from its threat to make GPS a requirement for passing auto inspections after Oct. 1.

 

Said Desai, it’s “beyond insult” that the city has not sat down to negotiate. “We’re just getting started. If the Oct. 1 deadline doesn’t get pushed back, we’ll do this again.”

 

The New York TWA struck Sept. 5 and 6, and in Philly only on the 5th, after projecting a two-day work stoppage. On Sept. 19, the New York TWA also filed a federal class-action lawsuit, seeking an injunction on constitutional privacy grounds against GPS.

 

This was the New York TWA’s second strike; its first was a successful 1998 strike, which infuriated former Mayor Rudy Giuliani. The TWA formed shortly afterward.  The New York TWA, which represents 10,000 yellow cab drivers out of 44,000 cabs, is about 60 percent South Asian with many Asian, African, Caribbean, and Middle Eastern immigrant workers. The Philadelphia TWA, with about 1250 workers, has a similar composition. These workers face racism and anti-immigrant hostility.

 

The TWA complains that the GPS system will include processing payment with credit cards for which the driver will be charged $5 per transaction. “That’s a pay cut,” about a $1000 a year’s worth, says the TWA.  In addition, drivers will have to pay up to $20 per week for GPS to vendors.

 

The TWA claims that the some 1200 GPS systems already in use frequently malfunction, causing meter shutdowns and lost fares. Another complaint is that satellite signals are often interrupted in an urban environment. What’s more, drivers must endure ads that will blare from back-seat TV screens.

 

The Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC), which regulates New York’s industry, has denied that GPS will be used to spy on drivers, but GPS has been referred to by TLC members as an “electronic trip sheet.” GPS doesn’t account for traffic problems or even bathroom breaks.

 

The New York strike faced a propaganda war led first and foremost by the Taxi and Limousine Commission. The TLC claimed that the last two fare increases included an agreement that drivers will accept GPS. Mayor Michael Bloomberg echoed the TLC line. But, in fact, there was no such concession from drivers.

 

The TLC is composed of “business leaders” and pro-boss political appointees from the Democratic and Republican parties. One TLC member, former Democratic Party Councilman Noach Dear, had received “massive” campaign funds from the taxi industry, reports The Village Voice.

 

Billionaire Mayor Bloomberg said early on the first day, “there will be very few, if any, taxi drivers striking,” but switched to asserting that “90 percent” of the drivers were out on the road. Yet Bloomberg was dead wrong. The New York TWA maintained it had 75% strike participation, while even the city’s Port Authority figures showed taxi customers were down at least 50%.

 

The indignant N.Y. ruling class offered drivers an incentive to scab with a zone-to-zone fare structure significantly above normal rates. The city also offered a special bus for New York’s beleaguered elite to get to an airport. In Philly, the city allowed scabbing limousine and sedan drivers to pick up passengers on the street and at taxi stands.

 

The New York TWA also faced opposition from a yellow-union outfit called the New York State Federation of Taxi Drivers. FTD leader Fernando Mateo organized drivers to go to key locations urging cabbies to scab.

 

Most TWA members must rent cabs each day from big cab company owners. Before 1979, at least 1/6 of all taxi drivers were union employees and most had health and pension benefits. Today, most cabbies are “independent contractors,” virtual slaves to big taxi companies.

 

Bloomberg claimed drivers make $28 an hour, $17 an hour after expenses. “No way,” claimed the TWA.  Drivers, they said, are making $10 to $12 an hour after expenses. Only after average daily cab rentals of  $130 up front for a typical 12-hour shift plus gas

expenses, is there “income”—if at all. An average driver’s yearly income is $25,000 to $30,000 a year.  Some have called it “a sweatshop on wheels.” The Transport Workers Union Local 100, which represents some 36,000 New York City subway and bus workers, showed solidarity by providing the TWA with a strike headquarters.

 

During TWU Local 100 contracts in 1999, 2002, and 2005, the taxi workers had uniquely pledged to strike in solidarity with transit workers. In December 2005, following the TWA leadership, a large minority of TWA members struck in solidarity as transit workers shutdown the financial capital of the world for over two days. In contrast, some Democratic Party labor-fakers were privately condemning the Local 100 strike and urging a quick end to the walkout.

 

Unfortunately, in 2007, Local 100’s ranks weren’t mobilized to provide taxi strike solidarity. During the taxi strike Local 100 President Roger Toussaint, an immigrant worker himself, gave a tepid statement to the media urging, “Management must negotiate

seriously.” It was a far cry from a call for a taxi-worker victory that could have inspired striking cabbies and transit workers alike.

 

Flexing real labor muscle in support of taxi workers, and other immigrant workers, would require membership education on defending the rights of immigrant workers, including supporting the May 1 immigrant rights marches. Mass demonstrations in support of the taxi strike should have been organized alongside sympathy slowdowns and/or strikes.

 

The pro-Democratic Party Central Labor Council—counterposed to a class-struggle approach—did little more than sit on its hands. Seen in the context of the CLC’s recent cancellation of New York’s historic 5th Avenue Labor Day Parade, that should come as no surprise.

 

Human Needs, Not Profits!