|
Hot enough for you?
by Michael G. Livingston
Forget about the TV images of snowstorms in Indiana! Forget about how cold you may (or may
not be) at this moment! What matters is global mean temperature. And the
data for 2004 are downright scary; 2004 had the
fourth highest global mean temperature since data were first
collected on a planetary scale in 1861 (thank you, British imperialism).
The 10 hottest years have all occurred since 1991, with the five
hottest years all occurring in the last seven years.
December was just filled with holiday cheer. In other holiday news,
about 20 percent of the world’s coral reefs have been destroyed by
pollution and global
warming, with another 50 percent damaged, but not beyond saving (Minneapolis
Star Tribune, Dec. 10, 2004). While coral reefs are extremely beautiful,
they also provide economic benefits worth about $375 billion per year and,
most importantly, are an essential component of the oceanic food chain. In plain
English, fewer reefs mean fewer fish and less seafood.
In mid-December environmental ministers from 80 countries met in Buenos
Aires to discuss climate change. Now that Russia has approved the Kyoto
Protocol, the protocol is set to take effect in mid-February. In
Buenos Aires, the U.S. again reiterated its opposition to the protocol and
said that Washington will not participate.
Also at the Buenos Aires meeting, the Inuit announced plans to seek
a ruling from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights that the U.S.
is
threatening Inuit existence in the Arctic by refusing to curb
greenhouse gas emissions (The New York Times, Dec.15).
A favorable ruling from the Inter-American Commission would give the
Inuit a legal basis for suing U.S. corporations and the U.S. government.
The Inuit have considerable reason to be worried. The Arctic Climate
Impact Assessment (ACIA), an international scientific report released on
Nov. 24,
showed that the Arctic is warming at twice the rate of the rest of
the planet—the ice is melting and the tundra is thawing. The melting ice
will result in
extinction of many species (such as the polar bear) and global
flooding.
But that is only the beginning. Methane, a greenhouse gas that is 20
times more potent then CO2 in terms of trapping heat, is stored in the
frozen tundra in the form of clathrates. As the temperature rises, the methane
can be released into the atmosphere, leading to run-away global warming far
worse than that caused by the increasing CO2 levels.
It is estimated that there are 400 billion tons of methane locked in
the Arctic—enough to create a burning hell on earth. Such an event occurred
before,
at the end of the Permian period 251 million years ago, when 94
percent of all marine species went extinct.
While the efforts of the Inuit are to be applauded and supported,
they are not enough. What is needed is a revitalized environmental movement
that relies on a mass-action strategy and political independence from the
ruling-class parties.
The ruling class, after all, is a capitalist ruling class. Their
power and position in the social order depends on the continued
exploitation of the planet
and the peoples of the planet.
It should be obvious to all that our environmental crisis is not
caused by a lack of scientific knowledge, but by the abuse of the planet
(and of
scientific knowledge) by capitalism.
In an irony almost too ghastly to contemplate, a number of
corporations and countries view the melting of the Arctic as an opportunity
for profit, opening up
areas for oil exploration and shipping routes (The New York Times,
“Week in Review,” Oct. 10, 2004).
Only a revolution can stop this madness; a revolution that builds a
sustainable and democratic socialist world order.
*This
article first appeared in the January 2005 issue of Socialist Action
newspaper.
|
