Socialist Action

 

SOCIALIST

ACTION

 

 - home page

 - newspaper
 - subscribe
 - distribute

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Antiwar Activists Build Movement to Fight FBI Repression

by David Jones  /  Nov. 2010 issue of Socialist Action newspaper

 

MINNEAPOLIS—”In an action registering a significant response to the widespread and growing opposition to the Obama administration’s latest assault on rights of free speech and political expression, grand jury subpoenas issued to 14 antiwar activists whose homes were raided by the FBI on Sept. 24 have been withdrawn.

Picket lines at a score of FBI offices across the country were organized almost immediately after the raids, including a protest of 500 in Minneapolis. Especially significant in light of the fact that many of the raid victims were union activists, resolutions condemning the FBI and Department of Justice harassment have been adopted by a growing number of labor organizations. On Oct. 14 the Duluth AFL-CIO Central Labor Body unanimously adopted a resolution of support for the Midwest antiwar activists, characterizing the raids and subpoenas as “a dangerous assault on free speech and association.”

Earlier, on Oct. 1, the state convention of AFSCME Council 5, representing 46,000 Minnesota state employees, unanimously passed a resolution noting that four of the raid victims were associated with AFSCME Local 3800 at the University of Minnesota and expressing “our grave concern that these raids may be the beginning of a new and dangerous assault on the First Amendment rights of every union fighter, international solidarity activist or anti-war campaigner.”

Chicago Teamster Local 705 passed a resolution on Oct. 17 condemning the raids and noted that among those subpoenaed were “Teamster Brother Mick Kelly from Minneapolis, as well as our Brother Joe Iosbaker, Chief Steward of SEIU Local 73, who has walked our ambulatory picket lines for the ‘Pain Ice Strike’ at University of Illinois-Chicago.”

Other labor federations, including the San Francisco Labor Council and the Troy Area Labor Council in upstate New York, have also passed resolutions supporting the targeted antiwar activists. 

Most recently, 62 members of the Minnesota state legislature signed a “Dear Colleague” letter addressed to President Barack Obama, U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken, and the Minnesota congressional delegation. The letter states, “Minnesota’s elected officials have frequently gone on record in defense of trade unionists and others to educate, mobilize, and organize for the legitimate goals of peace, justice, and solidarity with all working people ...”

Jess Sundin, one of the targets of the FBI raids, stated, “Minnesota legislators recognize us as leaders of this state’s peace movement and they know we have the support of the labor movement and their other constituents. Today many of them went on the record to stand up in defense of our rights to dissent and expressed their concern about FBI harassment of well-known community leaders. We will carry their support with us as we call for action at the federal level to stop this attack on our rights.”

On Oct. 23, President Obama’s campaign stop in Minneapolis was met by picketers who protested his administration’s attempt at repression of antiwar activity. On Oct. 30, Obama was faced with more pickets at a campaign appearance in Chicago.

Activists are planning fundraising events across the country to help those targeted by the FBI raids pay what will surely be enormous legal bills. In Chicago activists are preparing for a hip-hop concert fundraiser in late November headlined by local artist Rebel Diaz.

It is obvious that in the face of this impressive and growing solidarity the withdrawal of the subpoenas represents at least a temporary retreat by the government as they review their options.

There is, of course, no guarantee that subpoenas will not be re-issued or that indictments of the raid victims and others could be forthcoming from the grand jury. But the government has already failed in what was certainly one of its primary objects—to divide the antiwar movement and intimidate activists.

And the response, both by the victimized activists and supporters, has set an invaluable precedent for future attempts by the capitalist government to silence opponents of its reactionary and criminal wars.”

 

Human Needs, Not Profits!