Events
Literature
Newspaper
Directory
Links

Enter key words or concepts then select the 'search' button to search the Socialist Action web site

 Contact SA

SA Home

Socialist Action /April 2001

Britain's Farms in Crisis

In response to foot and mouth disease, the Labour Party government has ordered the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of farm animals.

What measures do socialists propose to solve this unprecedented disaster? Below is an editorial from Socialist Outlook, a monthly newspaper published by the British section of the Fourth International.

 

The countryside is under siege, and thousands of animals are being slaughtered and burned, as the foot and mouth outbreak spreads inexorably further across Britain.

The restrictions on movement of people and animals have effectively forced Prime Minister Tony Blair to scrap the option of a snap election in April, and helped to undermine the desired "feel good factor" which was supposed to be created by a relatively generous budget as part of Labour's preelection preparation.

This latest blow to the dwindling number of British farmers and to rural communities comes after a succession of food safety scares, and a collapse in the market price of pigs, sheep, and cattle.

This had brought a crisis even before the first outbreak of foot and mouth was confirmed. Figures for last year show average farm incomes in Wales have fallen to just over £4800, and in Scotland to just £3800.

This helps underline the fact that the once rich pickings of EU subsidies are just a fond memory for many small and medium-sized farms. This dire financial situation, with farm prices hammered ever lower by the monopoly purchasing power of a handful of profiteering supermarkets, has led to an exodus from farming and a frightening rate of suicide among farmers.

Against this background, the hollow claim of the so-called Countryside Alliance to represent the needs and demands of the rural population has been starkly exposed.

The protest march they had threatened to mobilize on London later this month-and which has now been postponed because of the foot and mouth epidemic-had nothing to do with the plight of small farmers, their low-paid workforce, the closure of village shops and post offices, or the absence of public transport or other key services in rural areas. It was purely and simply against the abolition of fox-hunting, a pursuit cherished by the rural rich.

Polarization between rich and poor

The countryside has become a reservoir of low pay, under-employment, and deprivation for working families. The closures of coal mining and many other traditional industries have also left large pockets of working-class communities living in "rural" areas, facing long journeys if they are to find work in urban areas.

But for the wealthy, with their large houses, holiday homes, leisure pursuits, and four-wheel drives, the countryside remains a playground. The polarization between rural rich and rural poor has widened with the privatization of bus services and the collapse of much of the rural economy.

And as the squeeze tightens on agriculture, it is only the biggest farms which have the reserves and the margins to ride out the rough times and wait for a future return to profitability. Yet the domination of agriculture by these big farms, linked in with the development of agribusiness at national and international level, has been a factor in the eruption and spread of foot and mouth disease.

The new pattern of farming and food production involves the routine transport of countless thousands of live animals from one end of Britain to the other. Many are now taken huge distances for slaughter in the reduced number of larger abattoirs [slaughter houses], following on the closure of much of the network of smaller more local abattoirs in order to cut costs.

Not only are there issues here of animal welfare, arising from the vast increase in avoidable distress and suffering to those animals that are shipped in crowded trailers, but the system appears designed to maximize the risk that a health problem in one area can rapidly spread to other areas throughout the country-especially if it is a disease as infectious as foot and mouth.

But there has also been a massive increase in the export of live animals to Europe and beyond: numbers of animals shipped across the Channel have increased more than four fold since the big protests against the trade in veal calves highlighted the issue a few years ago. At the same time, the global market in food stuffs and the constant search of the supermarkets and food processors for the cheapest possible supplies have led to a rising tide of imported meat from countries around the world, some of which have been wrestling with declared or undeclared outbreaks of foot and mouth.

Tony Blair's New Labour government has become one of the leading proponents of the virtues of the global economy and the free market system. Under Labour, the supermarkets have continued to reign supreme, pocketing billions in profits while squeezing food producers at home and abroad to the point of bankruptcy.

Now it is not just the rural population that is paying the price: the real cost of "cheap food" has repeatedly been exposed, and even Blair himself has been forced to question the "stranglehold" of the supermarkets.

Why should socialists and the workers movement care about these issues? Last autumn's fuel tax protests helped point to the disaffection of important sections of the middle classes-the "petty bourgeoisie," small producers, self-employed lorry drivers, and small farmers.

Socialist Outlook argued then that the labor movement should not ignore the problems these people were rising, but take on and fight for progressive policies that could tackle them.

We pointed out the lesson of history that sections of the petty bourgeoisie can easily turn towards the reactionary right if they see no positive response from the left. The same is true of the rural poor and the small farmers facing ruin in the current crisis.

Along with the Socialist Alliance [a coalition of parties that is running candidates throughout the country], we call for policies that address the underlying problems in the countryside, which in most cases flow from the operation of New Labour's new-found business friends-the banks, agribusiness, and the supermarkets.

Our alternative platform includes:

  • Big grants for small farmers to switch to organic production, where margins are higher and food is healthier.
  • Incentives for small farmers to form more cooperatives (as some are already doing) to share and reduce their costs and negotiate collectively with retailers and food process companies.
  • Incentives to reduce the transport and import of food that can be grown locally, thus reducing road traffic, pollution, and threats to animal welfare.
  • Prosecute-and nationalize-the feed manufacturers whose use of animal protein triggered the BSE crisis, but who have never paid even a penny in compensation for the damage done.
  • A steeply progressive turnover tax on multinational agribusiness and supermarkets.
  • Step up the regulation and inspection of health and safety procedures at all levels of agricultural production and food processing.
  • A big increase in the minimum wage.
  • Slash taxes on fuel, but impose a windfall tax on the oil companies, which have been creaming billions from rising crude oil prices.
  • Investment in cheap, efficient, and widespread publicly-owned rural transport services, using buses and rail.
  • Investment in active and diverse rural communities-including community facilities, youth clubs, schools, and environmental projects.

 

Socialist Action /April 2001