Events
Literature
Newspaper
Directory
Links

Enter key words or concepts then select the 'search' button to search the Socialist Action web site

 Contact SA

SA Home

Socialist Action /May 2001

Editorials

 

U.S. prosecution of Cuban agents backfires

The U.S. prosecution of a group of Cuban intelligence agents on espionage charges has begun to backfire. The Cubans had successfully infiltrated the Miami-based anti-Castro terrorist organizations, risking their lives to protect their country against the counterrevolutionary acts illegally organized and financed by the U.S. government.

By means of a bold defense these courageous revolutionaries have been able to turn the tables on their prosecutors. Rather than claim "innocence," all five have acknowledged that they were working for the Cuban ministry of the interior. But their unique defense against the charges has been to put U.S. policy and actions on trial.

Over the last few weeks, their lawyers have called a string of witnesses-some from Washington's own military and police agencies-to back up their contention that the real terrorists are the ones the United States repeatedly has sent to Cuba to attempt to murder their leaders, destroy their economy, and overturn the revolution.

The defendants have made judicial history in the course of their trial. Over the prosecutor's objections, the presiding judge has repeatedly allowed the jury to see and hear videotaped testimony from witnesses and experts living in Cuba-a tacit admission that their lives could be in jeopardy from the ultra-right-wing Cuban American commandos if they were forced to come to the U.S. to testify.

The significance of this case goes far beyond the lives and freedom of these five men, one of whom is being tried for murder in relation to the shooting down of the "Brothers to the Rescue" planes a few years ago.

That shoot-down was an obvious defensive move when you consider that the planes were led by a CIA-trained expert in explosives and sabotage who had carried out previous terrorist acts against Cuba and was sworn to overthrow Castro by any means. Yet it served as the pretext under which Clinton and Congress passed the Helms-Burton Act, further escalating the attempt to strangle Cuba economically.

As we write, the case has just gone to the jury. These courageous men should not only be freed but applauded as the true heroes they are.


Mass action for women's right to choose

In the face of escalating attacks on what is left of the right of abortion by a government tied to the most reactionary forces in the country, 7000 supporters of choice demonstrated in Washington, D.C., on April 22.

It was a small demonstration by comparison with past demonstrations by the women's movement. In the past, the National Organization for Women, organizers of this protest, has been able to rally up to half a million supporters of the right to choose in the national capital.

But the composition of the April 22 event was largely young, including many high-school women. Hopefully, the demonstration marked the beginning of a remobilization of the right-to-choose movement that over the years has become demobilized by the involvement of the established women's movement leadership in Democratic Party politics.

The spirits of the marchers were lifted by their confidence that they represent the majority opinion in the United States, although over past decades the right to abortion upheld in the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision of 1973 has been steadily whittled away by capitalist politicians pandering to organized bigotry.

As of 1998, 86 percent of counties in the United States had no abortion providers and almost a third of the cities. Now it is probably less.

The history of the fight for the right to choose is an object lesson in the limitations of American bourgeois democracy. In the early 1970s, the Supreme Court decision headed off the development of a mass movement for the right of abortion. But once that right appeared to have been granted, the majority public opinion was increasingly thwarted by politicians seeking to consolidate a right-wing constituency.

Hopefully, the time has come for the mass movement to be rebuilt. It is clear that the right of abortion will not be respected unless masses are mobilized in the streets independent of all capitalist politicians-the faint-hearted liberal friends as as well as the reactionary attack dogs.

 

War threat increases in Middle East

On April 30, Israeli tanks once again shelled Palestinian refugee neighborhoods in the Gaza Strip. The effect of this impressive military operation was to wound one nine-year-old boy and two elderly women.

In the same period, military clashes between Palestinian and Israeli armed forces took place in a number of other areas in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

More and more the conflict between the Palestinians and the Israeli state forces is looking like war, although a one-side war, with the Israeli military machine attacking unarmed Palestinian crowds and lightly armed Palestinian police.

The miserable Palestinian refugee camps in the Gaza strip over the past several weeks have repeatedly been the targets of shelling by heavy military weapons.

The plan for resuming negotiations proposed by Jordan and Egypt notably calls for an initial "ceasefire." That is, it is a proposal to suspend a war.

In these conditions, the recent Israeli strike against Syrian radar units deep in Lebanon set off alarm signals throughout the Arab world, because it indicated that the Zionist rulers were straining at the bit to solve their problems with another general war in the Middle East, focused against Syria.

The only apparent solution for the Zionists is to intimidate the Palestinian masses by inflicting disastrous defeats on one or more Arab states. The Zionists can utilize their military superiority best in conventional warfare. It is far less useful in suppressing popular insurrection, where it also creates increasing political problems.

In all their wars against the Arab populations of the region, the Zionists have won lightning military victories, only to be forced later to abandon territory that they could not hold in the face of the unremitting hostility of the people living on it. The logic of this situation is endless and escalating wars. Ultimately, the Jewish settler state cannot sustain this conflict.

Now Israel is running into the additional problem that the United States is according an increasing weight to its agreements with the conservative Arab regimes, and that Washington does not want its achievements in this respect blown sky high by another full-scale war in the Middle East. That obviously is why the U.S. rushed to restrain Israel after the Lebanon bombing.

The Zionists are now like beasts caught in a trap. They cannot get out, and every way they turn they suffer more damage.

It is clear that the Zionists offer no solution either for the Jewish people or the Palestinian people. They have to be removed from power by a combination of the Palestinian revolt and Jewish opposition to make way for a solution based on respect for the democratic rights and equality of both communities-a democratic secular Palestine.

 

End spy flights over China!

The bully U.S. imperialists cried foul last month when their high technology spy plane, in a confrontation with a Chinese fighter aircraft, went down on Chinese territory. The Chinese pilot was killed in the event.

The official statement from the 23-person super-spy crew captain, backed by the U.S. government, was that the United States did not recognize the airspace claimed by the Chinese government, and therefore, the U.S. plane had committed no violation of Chinese territory.

But when The New York Times reported that the U.S. government claimed the same, if not greater, airspace limitations as China in regard to its own territory, the imperialist cat was out of the bag. The big lie was exposed once again.

With public threats of military and economic retaliation, the Bush administration sought to limit the damage caused by its illegal actions.

The semi-apology issued by the White House was likely accompanied by agreements between the U.S. government and the Chinese Stalinist bureaucracy, including a limitation on the strength of the military weapons the U.S. planned to sell to its client state Taiwan.

The latter has long been used as a military threat against the Chinese deformed workers state.

 

Socialist Action /May 2001